The list of notable donors to USGenNet (not to be confused
with USGenWeb) for 2011 includes the usual suspects who had differences
with USGenWeb or rootsweb.com. The leadership has changed little, if
any, over the course of its existence. The leadership includes: Virginia
Cisewski, Bill Oliver, Rhoda Fone, Debbie Axtman, Pam Rietsch, Margie Daniels,
Stan Schwarze, Janet Schwarze, Jim Cole, Connie Burkett, Fred Smoot, and so on.
The stated goal of USGenNet was to bring free genealogy and
history to the internet. Their famous slogan in 2007, “Copycats on the Loose!”
It detailed instances of other Projects using ‘their’ data. (USGenNet claims it is Not a “Project”, but merely a provider of web space for Projects. Common
sense concludes otherwise.) http://www.usgennet.org/usgnhome/new2007.html
The historical goal of USGenNet might arguably be to wage a guerilla war against Rootsweb and to gain control of the USGenWeb Project.
The historical goal of USGenNet might arguably be to wage a guerilla war against Rootsweb and to gain control of the USGenWeb Project.
USGenNet was not bashful in using power to achieve their
goals, which might include going medieval on anyone they considered an enemy.
This text snip illustrates the power which they enjoyed:
http://www.radix.net/~merope/february2006.txt
Quote :SHOT IN THE FOOT: After yesterday's DBS, USGenNet helpfully published a series of emails, screenshots, and scans of various things in an apparent effort to defend its actions against Charles "Little Dog" Barnum and further assassinate his character. They are posted here:
http://www.radix.net/~merope/february2006.txt
Quote :SHOT IN THE FOOT: After yesterday's DBS, USGenNet helpfully published a series of emails, screenshots, and scans of various things in an apparent effort to defend its actions against Charles "Little Dog" Barnum and further assassinate his character. They are posted here:
We'll note a couple of things right off the bat. The first
"document" contains some excerpts of an email that Charles sent to
several recipients back at the end of January. We happen to have been one of
them, so we have a copy of the full email, and its nowhere near as snarky and trouble-making
as USGenNet would have you believe. Charles wanted to make a site that would link
directly to all county data wherever it may be held [although he excepted the
Archives from this]. He asked his correspondents to let him know what they
thought of this idea:
"What if we established a web site that listed every
database on USGENWEB Counties? It would have a list of states and under the
states a list of counties, and under counties a list of links to databases. I
do not mean we would invite people to submit links to us; we would just collect
them state-by-state. If you could see the web site name, you’d understand. Our
site would have no Byheehaws, no advisory board, no guidelines, no copyright
statement, no logos and no State Coordinators. It would not be a web ring and
no one would have to link to us. The county coordinators could do as the see
fit or even resign from USGW, but their links would remain as long as they were
valid links. No, I am not talking about stealing data. We’d collect links to counties
databases—not data. This is not an easy assignment. I built one for a state
awhile back, and I’ve learned from that. I’d pay for the domain name but I need
no-strings attached web space. I can’t do it alone. Fifty volunteers would be
optimum but I’d take 10 dedicated volunteers. Would it draw visitors? Yes, in
time. Cream rises to the top. Remember Cyndi’s list? That used to be a good
until it became a list of commercial sites. Ours will be 1000% better. If you
are interested and wiling to take risks, contact me. You’ll find me in
NM."
We have no idea what any of Charles' recipients thought of his proposal, but apparently one of them thought enough of it to forward it to USGenNet, which promptly took away his web space, message boards, and mailing lists. …” End Quote.
We have no idea what any of Charles' recipients thought of his proposal, but apparently one of them thought enough of it to forward it to USGenNet, which promptly took away his web space, message boards, and mailing lists. …” End Quote.
Regardless of the missteps the leadership took in the above Amanda
Knox type prosecution, one fact is that USGenNet is a Dick Tracy wrist watch in
the world of BlackBerrys and Smart Phones.
After USGenWeb separated from rootsweb.com, the fire burning in the heart of USGenNet became a dying ember.
The diaries and self-serving emails and inglorious web pages
do not prove that USGenNet is innocence of anything; they have no weight, because
the mislead can come up with their own version of stories like 'hard
core criminals' who think that they are always innocent.
Perhaps their failure might be traced to the strong arm
tactics by some of their troops. Or, perhaps they had the wrong motivation
in the first place-fist, and second place-second. Why does man not follow their
hearts instead of following others? To avoid that trap, we must all do what we know
is right. We all die, sooner than expected, better to follow your heart because
we're all naked. We have nothing to lose, it is already gone. Farwell
USGenNet; if what we think is true, you will fold in a matter of weeks.
For The Daryl
3 comments:
For the Daryl- Well said -
so long USgeNet- maybe soon to be followed by USGW-
The idea of one web site listing all genealogy databases in America sounds reasonable. At a later date, The Daryl took one step further. He created a search engine for USGenWeb. He was immediately attacked by the 'higher' powers of USGenWeb. They contended he violated copyright laws and used the USGenWeb logo without permission.
The reason the USGenWeb powers were upset may be that they did not think of the idea first. How dare an ordinary member to come up with a search engine without their own name being associated therewith.
The same flak was flying when the old Family Group Sheet Project was born. How dare they? How dare they!
Remember the USGenWeb news letter? It died because The Daryl became a a productive contributor to that rag.
Better to serve in hell than have a good genealogy Project; so, the news letter died. The Daryl no longer shared the limelight with the oh-so-grand clique that runs the joint.
Nothing grand or even remotely honorable with the Board members in the USGW. They only wish to rule and dish out what hatred they can while they can still hold a breath.
It does make on wonder just what will be said of those who held the iron rod within the walls of the USGW when they breath their final breath, Will there be kind words? I think not, they will be brushed off as they have brushed off The Daryl.
Say what you will, Daryl was the one who fought for the rights of CC's within the USGW, WHO will fight for them now???
Not the group who did their dirty best to ruin the FLGenWeb Project,Inc. -and by the way- What does it really state of the USGW Fl. Project when they do not even announce who they are up front? The dirty group hides behind the Original Florida name because of the shame that followed them into the USGW.Shame on those ladies for the turn tails they became, the greed they showed for what they wanted.
I do wonder just how things would have turned out if those so called special 3 had did their dirty best to work with the Florida group instead of tying to ruin it?? Not much has became of them since they hid within the walls of the USGW-
Breaching ones own grievance, and calling foul on others- FOR SHAME!!
And you do know who you are.
Post a Comment